Lookalike Firearms -

2/28/2012

President
Connecticut Carry, Inc
229 Branford Rd Unit 423
North Branford, CT 06471

Committee on Select Committee on Children

Members of the Committee,

I am writing to express my opposition to House Bill 5220 that would serve to ban air guns and ‘look-a-like’ firearms from within 1500 feet of school properties.

This bill is massively over reaching in its attempt to provide a solution to a non-existent problem. There is no current epidemic of air guns and ‘look-a-like’ firearms being brought into or around our schools. There is no tangible danger of an air gun or ‘look-a-like’ firearm being present within 1500 feet of our school properties. Further, current laws already make the kind of behavior this bill seems to be attempting to preemptively strike out against illegal. The bill’s broad scope would ban homeowners from owning air guns and children’s toys that resemble firearms within a quarter mile radius of all school properties. These zones will occupy a majority of many towns and cities and will make instant criminals out of many people because of a lack of clear and discernible indications of whether they are inside one of these zones. Law enforcement would also have a dramatically difficult time of trying to enforce this law since it would be difficult or impossible to mark the quarter mile zone around a school’s property.

This law is also rather redundant in the face of Connecticut General Statute 53-206c which makes it a class B misdemeanor to sell, brandish or carry “any nonfunctional imitation of an original firearm”. Any other threatening or violent behavior taken with a ‘look-a-like’ firearm is well covered in the remaining Connecticut General Statutes. This bill is a huge infringement on property rights and the rights of people to possess tools like air guns on their personal property with seemingly no justification based in reality for this loss of liberty.

Respectfully,

Richard Burgess
President
Connecticut Carry, Inc
Ph: 203-208-9577
Email: rich@connecticutcarry.com
http://ctcarry.com

Related Documents

FOI Response - Chief Salvatore (Cromwell) - Part 1FOI Request to Representative Diana Urban - Part 2Email to Public Safety CommitteeFOI Response - Chief Salvatore (Cromwell) - Part 2FOI Response - Susette Tibus - Part 3FOI Response - Chief Stewart (Stonington) - Letter to Rep urbanFOI Response - First Selectman Habereck - Police Report ReleaseFOI Response - Chief Rovella (Hartford)FOI Response - Chief Stewart (Stonington) - EmailsFOI Response - First Selectman Habereck - EmailsEmail regarding unanimous committee vote on HB 5220 - Part 5FOI Response - Representative Mushinsky - Press ConferenceFOI Request to Representative Diana Urban - Part 1Email regarding unanimous committee vote on HB 5220 - Part 6FOI Response - Principal Mark Friese (Stonington)Email regarding unanimous committee vote on HB 5220 - Part 2Email regarding unanimous committee vote on HB 5220 - Part 1FOI Request to Representative Diana Urban - Part 3FOI Response - Susette Tibus - Part 2FOI Response - Representative FawcettFOI Response - Superintendent Masterjoseph - EmailsFOI Response - Susette Tibus - Part 1Email regarding unanimous committee vote on HB 5220 - Part 3FOI Response - Susette Tibus - Part 6Email regarding unanimous committee vote on HB 5220 - Part 4FOI Request to Representative Diana Urban - Part 4FOI Response - Chief Salvatore (Cromwell) - Part 4FOI Response - Susette Tibus - Part 4FOI Response - Superintendent Masterjoseph - Cover pageFOI Response - Susette Tibus - Part 5Email to committee about facsimile firearms already being regulated by statuteFOI Response - Chief Salvatore (Cromwell) - Part 3
scroll up